ArticleSocial science & medicine (1982)2026
Incentivizing co-occurring disorder diagnoses through blended payments.
Article in Social science & medicine (1982), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Alcohol and mental health care integration in traumatically injured patients with elevated BAC: a retrospective chart review.Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTreatments for mental health and substance use problems have historically been unintegrated, limiting co-occurring disorders treatment. Blending discrete payment models is one potential facilitator of integrated care. This study assesses the impact of one blended payment strategy on the diagnosis of co-occurring disorders in a community mental health system.
methodsElectronic health record data for 19373 individuals, with 173889 observations from January 2017 through December 2019 was analyzed for this study. Multilevel growth modelling was used for data analysis. A binary dependent variable represented whether a service user held diagnoses of co-occurring disorders within a month. Fixed effects included time variables and a variable representing blended payment initiation as well as race, gender, age, and payor. Service user and agency variables were modeled as random effects.
findingsBlended capitated and fee-for-service payments were found to increase the odds of service users receiving co-occurring diagnoses. People of color had lower odds of receiving a co-occurring diagnosis, although this effect did not hold in an analysis of rural agencies. Service users receiving care in unintegrated agencies had higher odds of receiving co-occurring diagnoses.
conclusionThis study is one of the first to assess the impacts of a blended payment model on behavioral health access. Blended payment models can incentivize behavioral health providers and systems to identify complex diagnoses that may go unrecognized in routine care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.