ArticleUltrasonics sonochemistry2026
Direct vs indirect ultrasound-assisted extraction of phenolics from wild sumac (Rhus tripartita): Optimization by Response Surface Methodology (RSM) and LC-MS profiling.
Article in Ultrasonics sonochemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Intensification of Palmaria palmata protein biorefinery using multifrequency ultrasonication and enzymes.Ultrasonics sonochemistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study explores the potential of wild sumac (Rhus tripartita) fruits as a rich source of antioxidants. To achieve this, two ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE) techniques-indirect (IUAE) and direct (DUAE)-were employed under predefined conditions to optimize antioxidant recovery. The extraction parameters for each method were investigated using response surface methodology (RSM) and Box-Behnken Design (BBD), focusing on three key factors for each method. The total phenolic content, quantified by the Folin-Ciocalteu method (TP-FC), was defined as the response variable. TP-FC values ranged from ∼ 6 to ∼ 12 mg GA eq./g DW for IUAE, and from 11 to 30 mg GA eq./g DW for DUAE. Quadratic models were developed and the determination coefficients exceeded 0.9 for both methods, confirming models' reliability. ANOVA results indicated that temperature and time were the most influential factors in IUAE, while power and time were most impactful in DUAE. Overall, DUAE proved more efficiency than IUAE, yielding up to 26.74 mg GA eq./g DW under optimal conditions (53 %, 30 min, and 80 for power, time, and liquid/solid ratio, respectively). Furthermore, the DUAE obtained R. tripartita extract was profiled for its phenolic composition. LC-MS was used for initial identification of major phenolic compounds, followed by HPLC quantification using corresponding standards. Ten compounds were unequivocally identified. Notably, masazinoflavanone, first identified in 2005, was systematically quantified for the first time in R. tripartita, emerging as the predominant compound at 36.6 mg/g DW, which accounted for 82 % of total phenolics. Other identified compounds included more common molecules, like amentoflavone, myricetin, and quercetin derivatives, with contents ranging from 0.21 and 3.47 mg/g DW.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.