ArticleEBioMedicine2025
Development and validation of a bronchoalveolar lavage genomic classifier for acute cellular rejection.
Article in EBioMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Lung transplantation in 2025: a narrative review of progress, challenges, and the road ahead.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
- Tracing cell communication programs across conditions at single cell resolution with CCC-RISE.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Yangxin Tongluo Decoction Protects Against Sepsis-Associated Cardiac Dysfunction Through Regulating Nrf2 Pathway.Mediators of inflammation · 2026Article
- Feasibility and Safety of 1.1-mm Cryobiopsy for Acute Rejection Surveillance in Lung Transplant Recipients: A Comparative Study and Review of the Literature.Pulmonary medicine · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAcute cellular rejection (ACR) is the main risk factor for chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD), but diagnosis requires invasive transbronchial biopsy (TBB). We previously demonstrated the feasibility of bronchoalveolar lavage cell pellet (BAL-cp) gene expression for ACR diagnosis. We sought to develop and validate a genomic classifier for ACR in a multicenter cohort.
methodsWe performed RNA-seq on 806 BAL-cp from 181 lung transplant recipients enrolled in CTOT-20. Differential expression was based on fold difference >2.0 and False Discovery adjusted p-value <0.05. Samples were randomly split 80:20 into training and testing sets. A Random Forest model was optimized for area under the curve (AUC), and the threshold for genomic ACR was selected for classification accuracy. We validated performance in an independent single-centre cohort. Cox models evaluated risk for CLAD.
findingsFrom 37 clinically significant ACR and 151 stable control samples, we identified 62 ACR genes, indicating upregulation of T-cell receptor signalling, and downregulation of CTLA4 signalling in cytotoxic lymphocytes, among other enriched pathways. A 31-gene Random Forest model's AUC was 0.99 (SE 0.0053) in the training set, and 0.72 (SE 0.0874) in the test set. At a probability threshold of 0.396, accuracy for distinguishing clinically significant ACR cases from stable controls was 93.1% (specificity 95.4%, sensitivity 83.8%). In the independent validation cohort, accuracy was 82.1% (specificity 87.5%, sensitivity 73.3%). The model classified 138 (17.1%) CTOT-20 samples as genomic ACR. Late genomic ACR (≥90 days posttransplant) associated with increased CLAD risk (HR 2.52, 95% CI 1.47-4.34, p < 0.001).
interpretationA BAL-cp genomic classifier can identify ACR, predict CLAD risk, and may be a less invasive alternative to TBB after lung transplant.
fundingThis study was supported by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases awards U01AI113315 and U01AI0635594, the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation award PALMER19AB0, and the Saul and Joyce Brandman Foundation Center for Lung Health at UCLA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.