ArticleCancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center
Determinants of Colorectal Cancer: Risk Factors, Knowledge, and Diagnosis in a Cross-Sectional Study of Saudi Adults.
Article in Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
IntroductionColorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most prevalent cancer in Saudi Arabia, with a rising incidence among younger adults. Despite the known benefits of early detection and screening, public awareness and screening uptake remain limited. Understanding knowledge, attitudes, and determinants of screening and diagnosis is essential to guide public health interventions and policies.MethodsThis cross-sectional study was conducted between August 2024 and January 2025 among adults aged 18 years and older across Saudi Arabia using a validated Arabic-language self-administered questionnaire. Data were analyzed to assess CRC knowledge, screening practices, and diagnostic patterns, as well as their sociodemographic determinants.ResultsA total of 2113 participants (mean age: 34 ± 9.6 years; 74% female) completed the survey. Overall, 53% demonstrated good CRC knowledge, while screening prevalence was notably low (2%), and 2.1% reported a prior diagnosis. Higher knowledge was observed among males, participants with higher income, and those reporting frequent fiber intake. Higher BMI was associated with lower screening uptake, whereas education level and income influenced diagnosis likelihood. Age was significantly associated with both screening and diagnosis outcomes.ConclusionsThis study highlights moderate CRC knowledge and low screening participation among Saudi adults. Targeted national awareness campaigns, integration of CRC screening into primary healthcare, and digital outreach for younger populations are recommended to enhance early detection, promote preventive practices, and reduce the national CRC burden.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.