ArticleJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2026
Gemcitabine Intravesical System Plus Cetrelimab or Cetrelimab Alone as Neoadjuvant Therapy in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: SunRISe-4 Primary Analysis and Biomarker Results.
Article in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04919512 (A Phase 2, Open-Label, Multi-Center, Randomized Study of TAR-200 in Combination With Cetrelimab and Cetrelimab Alone in Participants With Muscle-Invasive Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder Who Are Scheduled for Radical Cystectomy and Are Ineligible for or Refusing Platinum-Based Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase 2, Open-Label, Multi-Center, Randomized Study of TAR-200 in Combination With Cetrelimab and Cetrelimab Alone in Participants With Muscle-Invasive Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder Who Are Scheduled for Radical Cystectomy and Are Ineligible for or Refusing Platinum-Based Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Redefining standards: a comprehensive systematic review of practice changing advances in GU oncology from ASCO and ESMO 2025.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Pooled it
- Neoadjuvant Therapy in Cisplatin-Ineligible Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: Recent Progress, Challenges, and Future Directions in the Era of TAR-200 and Enfortumab Vedotin Plus Pembrolizumab.Oncology and therapy · 2026Review
- Post-IMvigor011 Era: CtDNA-Guided Postoperative Adjuvant Treatment Stratification in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer.Cancer management and research · 2026Review
- The 2025 paradigm shift in urothelial carcinoma pharmacotherapy: from chemotherapy to ADCs and ICIs.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- Balancing immunity with Tregs.Nature biotechnology · 2026Article
- Roundup.Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of IndiaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeStandard of care for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) is radical cystectomy (RC) with neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy (NAC). However, many patients are ineligible for or refuse cisplatin. SunRISe-4 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04919512) is an open-label, multicenter, parallel-cohort phase II study assessing neoadjuvant gemcitabine intravesical system (TAR-200/gem-iDRS) plus cetrelimab or cetrelimab monotherapy in patients with MIBC.
methodsAdults with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1, cT2-T4a N0M0, ineligible/refusing NAC, and planned for RC were randomly assigned 5:3, stratified by transurethral resection of bladder tumor completeness (residual tumor ≤3 cm permitted) and T stage, to receive TAR-200 plus cetrelimab (cohort 1) or cetrelimab monotherapy (cohort 2). The primary end point was pathologic complete response (pCR) at RC. Secondary end points included recurrence-free survival (RFS) and safety. Exploratory end points included pathologic overall response (pOR; ≤ypT1N0) and circulating tumor (ct) and urinary tumor (ut) DNA molecular residual disease (MRD). Side-by-side descriptive efficacy summary was planned.
resultsAt the May 9, 2025, data cutoff, 159 patients were treated; 88 in cohort 1 and 46 in cohort 2 underwent RC. pCR, pOR, and 1-year RFS rates were 38%, 53%, and 77% in cohort 1 and 28%, 44%, and 64% in cohort 2, respectively. pCR rates were consistent across subgroups. No new safety signals were observed. Across cohorts, utDNA- status before RC (week 12) and utDNA clearance correlated with pCR (
conclusionTAR-200 plus cetrelimab provided higher pCR, pOR, and 1-year RFS rates compared with cetrelimab monotherapy, supporting further investigation of the neoadjuvant combination in MIBC. utDNA and ctDNA MRD results support further investigation as biomarkers for residual local and nonlocal disease, respectively.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.