Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41337562›Full record

ArticleRevista brasileira de epidemiologia = Brazilian journal of epidemiology2025

Epidemiology in dialogues: belonging to the Collective Health field, practices and theoretical tensions.

Rita Barradas Barata

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista brasileira de epidemiologia = Brazilian journal of epidemiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Rita Barradas BarataFaculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo - São Paulo (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7215-9788

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIn this essay, we discuss the belonging of Epidemiology to the Collective Health field, theories and contributions of Epidemiology to the health work process and to the impact assessment of Collective Health programs and actions, and the practical and theoretical tensions in the discipline and in the field.

methodsThe essay was conducted based on the theoretical contributions of various authors who reflected on Epidemiology throughout the 20th and early 21st centuries as well as the author's own experiences. It is organized into four thematic sections: the discipline's role within the field of Collective Health; the relations between Epidemiology and health practices; practical and theoretical tensions within the discipline itself and other disciplines within the field; and reflections on possible dialogues.

resultsWe suggest resorting to transdisciplinarity, understanding the dynamics of scientific fields, overcoming false hierarchies between types of knowledge, defeating disciplinary limits, and decentralizing network connections as ways of coping with and overcoming difficulties.

conclusionsThe reward for this effort lies in the possibility of achieving effective responses to complex issues that, in addition to improving the health situation of populations, can be guided by the moral imperative of reducing inequalities and social injustices, respecting human rights, and building a more supportive and healthy society.

Indexed as

EpidemiologyInterdisciplinary CommunicationPublic HealthHumans

Identifiers

PMID41337562
PMCPMC12667505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.