ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2025
Restoring institutional confidence in backsliding democracies: Evidence from Mexico.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Restoring institutional confidence in backsliding democracies: Evidence from Mexico.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Declining confidence in public institutions afflicts many democracies, a trend apparently exacerbated by backsliding leaders. These are leaders who gradually undermine the institutions that sustain democratic competition and accountability. Does the rhetoric of backsliders undermine the public's confidence in the institutions under attack and can rebuttals of presidential diatribes restore this confidence? We explore the impact of backsliding leaders' anti-institutional rhetoric in the context of Mexico. With text-as-data analyses, we demonstrate the harshness of President Andrés Manuel López Obrador's (2018-2024) anti-institutional diatribes against the agency that oversees national elections. With survey experiments, we demonstrate that these diatribes can indeed undermine public confidence. Yet our research also uncovers the potential for rebuttals to restore confidence. Counternarratives offered by organizations viewed as above the fray of Mexican politics restored public confidence-surprisingly, even among the president's supporters. Our findings suggest strategies for breaking out of the cage of intense partisanship and countering democracy-degrading rhetoric. Though presidential haranguing of democratic institutions can have a powerful effect, there remains room for public confidence to be restored by more positive accounts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.