ArticlePloS one2025
What do future physicians think of traditional, complementary, and integrative medicine (TCIM)? Fifteen years after the inclusion of TCIM in the Swiss constitution.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAn increasing recognition of traditional, complementary and integrative medicines' (TCIM) contributions for public health has driven the development of international policy recommendations for its inclusion into national healthcare systems. While many countries have made advances in the incorporation of TCIM in academic medicine, there are globally only a handful that have a constitutional mandate in this context. The present cross-sectional study focused on one of these, namely Switzerland, some fifteen years after TCIM was included into the country's Federal Constitution. AIMS &
methodsThis research aimed to examine attitudes of the future medical workforce in regard to TCIM within the only European country in which TCIM is mandated by the constitution. More specifically, using an online survey tailored to the country's socio-political context, this study assessed attitudes, knowledge, and expectancies regarding TCIM among medical students across all Swiss universities that offer degrees in human medicine.
resultsEven though Swiss medical schools have consolidated and expanded their TCIM-related curricula compared to earlier assessments, with all of them now offering mandatory TCIM classes, most participants were unaware of this. Nonetheless, two-thirds of the N = 695 participants considered TCIM a valuable extension of conventional medicine that should have a place in medical education. Views diverged greatly between TCIM modalities. Further, we found significant differences as a function of gender and linguistic regions, although in the latter case effect sizes were modest.
conclusionsKnowing the views of medical students as the future generation of physicians, clinical scientists, and often also decision-makers in the context of policy-driven integration is crucial in understanding the future trajectory of TCIM into mainstream healthcare. Based on Switzerland's unique experience and history in this context this work contributes to the broader discourse on the role of TCIM in national healthcare systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.