ArticlePLoS genetics2025
A fly model of SCA36 reveals combinatorial neurotoxicity of hexanucleotide and dipeptide repeats.
Article in PLoS genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spinocerebellar ataxia type 36 (SCA36) is a neurodegenerative disease caused by expanded (GGCCTG)n hexanucleotide repeat sequence in the NOP56 gene. While the expanded repeats could transcribe and form toxic RNA foci within neurons, recent evidence indicates that translation of these repeats produces dipeptide repeats (DPR) that contribute to neurotoxicity. The relative impact of hexanucleotide RNA repeats (HRR) and DPR on the neurodegeneration of SCA36 remains unclear. Here, we established a Drosophila SCA36 model to dissect the neurotoxic effects of HRR and DPR. The fly model recapitulates the cellular defects observed in SCA36 patient fibroblasts, validating its relevance for mechanistic study of SCA36. Further engineering the transgenes to express individual DPRs reveal Proline-Glycine-DPR (PG-DPR) as the most potent neurotoxin causing progressive motor and sensory dysfunction. Expressing a series of the SCA36 transgenes with varying HRR lengths demonstrates an age- and length-dependent adult-onset neurodegeneration. Interestingly, sequence modification of the transgenes to exclusively express HRR or DPR alone causes a milder phenotype, indicating both HRR and DPR contribute partially to the pathogenicity of SCA36. Therefore, this model provides a valuable platform for screening drug targeting either HRR- or DPR-mediated toxicity of SCA36. Suppression of the RNA elongation factor SUPT4H1 ortholog reduces RNA foci in cell culture. However, expression level of SUPT4H1 was not changed in SCA36 patient cells. Interestingly, knockdown of the Drosophila SUPT4H1 ortholog or 6-azauridine treatment to suppress RNA transcription aggravates the neurodegenerative phenotypes in both the fly models and patient-derived fibroblasts, highlighting the complex interplay of pathomechanisms in SCA36. These results underscore the need for carefully evaluating the potential side effects when designing therapeutic interventions for SCA36.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.