ArticlePloS one2025
Robotic versus electromagnetic bronchoscopy for pulmonary leslon assessment using integrated intraprocedural imaging: Study protocol for the reliant 2 trial.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Robotic Versus Electromagnetic Bronchoscopy for Pulmonary LesIon AssessmeNT: (the RELIANT Trial)
Robotic Versus Electromagnetic Bronchoscopy for Pulmonary LesIon AssessmeNT Using Integrated Intraprocedural Imaging: the RELIANT 2 Trial
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRobotic assisted bronchoscopy (RAB) and electromagnetic navigational bronchoscopy (ENB) are two approaches to biopsy peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs). A recently completed cluster randomized controlled trial, RELIANT (NCT05705544), showed no difference in diagnostic yield between these two modalities. The ENB platform used in RELIANT included integrated digital tomosynthesis, allowing for real-time assessment of PPL location for more precise targeting at the time of biopsy. RAB has since been integrated with cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) to accomplish the same intraprocedural correction. It is unclear if the diagnostic yield of RAB with integrated CBCT (RAB-CBCT) is superior to ENB with integrated digital tomosynthesis (ENB-DT).
methodsRobotic versus Electromagnetic Bronchoscopy for Pulmonary LesIon AssessmeNT using integrated intraprocedural imaging (RELIANT 2) is an investigator-initiated, multicenter, open label, superiority, cluster randomized trial. At each participating institution, procedural rooms are randomly assigned to either RAB-CBCT or ENB-DT, with each procedure room-day considered a cluster. All adult patients undergoing navigational bronchoscopy for evaluation of PPL(s) are eligible. Allocation is concealed from schedulers, proceduralists, and patients until the morning of procedure when each room is randomized to a platform. The primary endpoint is the diagnostic yield, defined as the proportion of cases yielding a specific benign or malignant diagnosis per current ATS/ACCP definition. Secondary and safety endpoints include procedure duration and procedural complications. Enrollment began on November 11, 2024 and is expected to enroll approximately 440 patients in 220 clusters. DISCUSSION: RELIANT 2 is an ongoing cluster randomized trial comparing the diagnostic yield of RAB-CBCT to that of ENB-DT in patients undergoing bronchoscopy to biopsy PPLs. This trial will help address some of the limitations of the recently published RELIANT trial. Trial registration The trial was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06654271) on October 21, 2024, prior to patient enrollment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.