Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41336179›Full record

ArticleIEEE transactions on medical imaging2026

In Vivo Positron Emission Particle Tracking (PEPT) of Single Cells Using an Expectation Maximization Algorithm.

Hieu T M Nguyen, Neeladrisingha Das, Rohollah Nasiri, Guillem Pratx

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hieu T M Nguyen
Neeladrisingha Das
Rohollah Nasiri
Guillem Pratx

Funding

Stanford Molecular Imaging Scholars (SMIS) ProgramT32CA118681 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CRAIG S LEVIN · 2016 to 2026
$4.3M
New tools for tracking single cells in vivoR01EB030367 · NIBIB · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI PRATX, GUILLEM, SPRIET, MATHIEU · 2020 to 2024
$2.4M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA118681NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB030367
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell tracking is crucial for understanding the complex patterns of cellular migration that underlie many physiological, pathological, and therapeutic processes. Positron emission particle tracking (PEPT) is a method that uses list-mode positron emission tomography (PET) data to localize moving particles non-invasively inside opaque systems. However, while the application of this method to in vivo cell tracking has previously been evoked, its implementation has been limited to tracking one cell at a time. This study investigates the feasibility of tracking multiple cells simultaneously using a recently developed expectation maximization (EM) algorithm called PEPT-EM. The primary challenge to the translation of this algorithm towards biomedical applications is the low radioactivity of the cells being tracked. We experimentally demonstrated the performance of the PEPT-EM algorithm using a preclinical PET scanner for tracking droplets and cells with activities ranging from tens to hundreds of Bq, in phantoms and in a murine model. We found that while background and multiplexing effects impact static source tracking, sensitivity is critical for dynamic tracking of moving sources. We successfully localized multiple single cells in a murine model, moving at speeds up to 25 mm/s, marking the first use of PEPT-EM for such applications. Our findings highlight the exciting potential of PEPT for real-time, high throughput tracking of multiple single cells in vivo, paving the way for studying cell tracking in biological systems.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsCell TrackingImage Processing, Computer-AssistedPositron-Emission TomographySingle-Cell AnalysisAnimalsHumansMicePhantoms, Imaging

Identifiers

PMID41336179
PMCPMC12747494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.