ArticlePloS one2025
Agronomic performance of cocoa production type systems in Colombia.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Socio-economic and livelihood conditions influence the design of cocoa-based agroforestry systems (AFS), as they determine the selection of accompanying species and the overall productivity of the system. These arrangements contribute to income diversification, enhanced food security and increased resilience to climate-related impacts. However, achieving these benefits depends to a large extent on the capabilities of rural households, which are shaped by their human, social, cultural, political, financial, natural, and infrastructural assets. This study analyzes the incidence of rural household type, according to livelihood strategies on the agronomic performance and co-product generation of cocoa crops established in agroforestry systems, in the departments of Caquetá, Huila and Meta in Colombia. Capital endowments for cocoa production, as well as the intensity and frequency of shade canopy species associated with cocoa, were determined in 83 rural households. Then, 112 sampling plots of 1000 m2 were established, where 20 variables of information on floristic composition, forest structure of the AFS, state of pest attack and diseases, and cocoa bean production were taken. It was found that the agroforestry characteristics of the cocoa crop and its production differed between rural household types and departments. A total of 176 species associated with cocoa were found, but only 89 were recognized by the farmers. These species were grouped into 17 uses, the most frequent being self-consumption, shade, wood, and sale (for human food). The livelihood strategy and assets for cocoa production had a high impact on the agronomic performance of the crop. Households with more experience, technology, knowledge and dedication to the crop obtained higher cocoa bean yields. These results affirm that the management and efficiency of cocoa-based AFS depend on the articulation of social processes and the design of the AFS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.