Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41335674›Full record

ArticleAnnual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference2025

Automated Point-of-Care Bladder Pressure and Volume Measurement Device for Urodynamic Monitoring.

Elias C Hinson, Margot S Damaser, Hui Zhu, Steve J A Majerus

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Elias C Hinson
Margot S Damaser
Hui Zhu
Steve J A Majerus

Funding

RRD VA IK6 RX003843
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urinary incontinence affects approximately 8.2% of the global population, with patients suffering from spina bifida (SB), spinal cord injury (SCI), and multiple sclerosis (MS) at an increased risk for urinary complications. Traditional urodynamic studies (UDS) used for bladder function monitoring can be costly and logistically challenging, especially for patients in remote areas. This study introduces a catheter connected automated draining device designed to measure bladder pressure and volume during the draining phase, offering an alternative to conventional urodynamic testing. The system used a pressure and a volumetric sensor to capture bladder data during urine drainage. The device was evaluated through in vitro testing, with a multi-point 5th-order calibration procedure that generated accurate pressure and volume readings. Pressure and volume accuracy was validated via Bland-Altman analysis, with limits of agreement of 0.26 cmH

Indexed as

Point-of-Care SystemsUrinary BladderUrodynamicsAutomationCalibrationEquipment DesignHumansMonitoring, PhysiologicPressureReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID41335674
PMCPMC13404318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.