ArticlePloS one2025
Navigating public, semi-public, and private drug use environments: A qualitative examination of unsheltered homelessness and drug use in Baltimore City.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Health Harms Associated With Forced Displacements Among People Who Use Drugs in San Francisco, California.Substance use & addiction journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Unsheltered people experiencing homelessness (PEH) in the United States (US) have a disproportionately high burden of illegal drug use and overdose. Due to their economic and social marginalization, unsheltered PEH who use drugs are often constrained in where they use drugs, and this can hinder their engagement in harm reduction practices and increase their overdose risk. Using interpretative phenomenological analysis, this study investigates how unsheltered PEH who use drugs in Baltimore City perceive and engage with their drug use environment and how public, semi-public, and private features of their environment influence drug use practices and overdose risk. Public settings (e.g., street) are accessible to the general public, while semi-public settings (e.g., library restrooms) provide public access with some restrictions. In contrast, private settings (e.g., private residence) are under private ownership with no public access. Participants were recruited from the AIDS Linked to Intravenous Experience (ALIVE) Study. Data was analyzed from interviews conducted with nine participants. Participants described complex experiences managing their drug use in public, semi-public, and private spaces. In public and semi-public spaces, participants engaged in varied strategies to seek privacy. Privacy in these spaces provided participants a sense of refuge from policing and interference, but in some instances, at the expense of drug use safety. To access private spaces for drug use and shelter, participants reported engaging in an informal economy of sharing drugs and other resources. Using in private spaces enhanced participants' sense of comfort and enabled safer drug use practices, though access to these spaces was inconsistent. A building where people can use drugs safely and privately with supervision from peers and medical staff was commonly described as an ideal drug use space across participants. Findings highlight the need to identify resources and interventions to facilitate safer drug use for unsheltered PEH who use drugs in the US. Future interventions should take a multi-level, harm reduction approach, targeting contextual and individual factors to promote safer drug use and minimize the risk of drug use-related harms among unsheltered PEH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.