Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41335597›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2025

Maternal mortality in Goiás: Causes of maternal death and barriers to underreporting.

Emily Nayana Nasmar de Melo, Otaliba Libânio de Morais Neto, Ana Maria Nogales Vasconcelos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Emily Nayana Nasmar de MeloFederal Institute of Education, Science and Technology of Goiás, Águas Lindas Campus, Águas Lindas de Goiás, Goiás, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7680-9805
Otaliba Libânio de Morais NetoInstitute of Tropical Pathology and Public Health, Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.
Ana Maria Nogales VasconcelosDepartment of Statistics, University of Brasília, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study is to describe the causes of maternal deaths and estimate the magnitude of maternal mortality in the state of Goiás, considering the underreporting of maternal deaths from 2016 to 2021. This is a descriptive study that linked data from the Mortality Information System (SIM in Portuguese) and the Live Birth Information System (SINASC in Portuguese) using a linkage procedure. The aim was to identify maternal deaths and their causes and calculate the Maternal Mortality Ratio (MMR). A total of 417 maternal deaths were officially reported in Goiás from 2016 to 2021. Among these, 291 matches were identified between the systems, including 239 cases where the declared underlying cause was maternal death, 17 with presumed causes, and 35 with other causes. The leading causes of death for maternal deaths, deaths with presumed causes, and other deaths were, respectively: other obstetric conditions not elsewhere classified; symptoms, signs, and abnormal clinical and laboratory findings not elsewhere classified; and certain infectious and parasitic diseases. Considering only declared maternal deaths, the MMR ranged from 55.79 (2016) to 137.46 (2021) deaths per 100,000 live births (LB), reflecting a 146% increase. Considering the inclusion of deaths identified through linkage, the MMR ranged from 55.79 (2016) to 157.42 (2021) deaths per 100,000 LB, representing an 182% increase. The underestimation of MMR values was adjusted compared to direct estimates using the SIM and SINASC systems. This indicates that maternal mortality is higher than reflected in official statistics.

Identifiers

PMID41335597
PMCPMC12674508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.