ArticlePloS one2025
Mapping the climate and agronomic digital advisory services landscape in West and Central Africa: A step towards making food systems productive and climate resilient.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study explores and examines the availability of digital agricultural solutions (DAGs) to enhance agricultural resilience in the face of climate change. The countries under study-Burundi, Ivory coast, Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), Ghana, Nigeria, and Rwanda-display varying levels of vulnerability, suffering from low adaptive capacity to address climate impacts. The study examines available DAGs to support farmers, including mobile-based platforms providing weather and agronomic advice, market information, and financial services. We highlight the diverse needs and challenges faced by three key user groups of digital agro-climatic services: farmers, service providers, and policymakers. All stakeholders require tailored approaches to improve adoption and impact. We employed a mixed-method approach that combined literature review with semi-structured interviews to identify existing digital solutions in agriculture. Next, we produced country-specific reports to assess the current state of agronomic digital advisory services, their users, and challenges. Ghana, Nigeria, and Rwanda have made notable strides in delivering these services, though challenges such as inadequate infrastructure, high internet costs, and gender disparities hinder their wider adoption. Additionally, data fragmentation and lack of harmonization across platforms pose significant barriers to optimizing these digital solutions. We discuss the role of public extension services and policy frameworks in fostering digital transformation in agriculture, with an emphasis on the need for better data harmonization to improve decision-making. The study underscores the importance of integrating digital technologies with stronger policies, improved infrastructure, and greater inclusivity to support climate-resilient agricultural practices in the region.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.