Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41335589›Full record

Observational studyPloS one2025

Post-vaccination SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies in pregnant women receiving biologics for inflammatory bowel disease.

Donna E Leet, Jing Jin, Charles S Craik, Michael G Kattah, Millie D Long, Uma Mahadevan

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Donna E LeetDepartment of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4494-1705
Jing JinVitalant Research Institute, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Charles S CraikDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of California, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Michael G KattahDepartment of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Millie D LongDepartment of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
Uma MahadevanDepartment of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) treatments and pregnancy can independently modulate immune responses, but the combined impacts on SARS-CoV-2 vaccine-induced immunity are poorly understood. This study explores the efficacy of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and placental antibody transfer among pregnant women with IBD on biologic therapies. This observational study included pregnant women with and without IBD from the PIANO and PREVENT-COVID studies and their neonates. We assessed anti-SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody titers (NT50) in maternal and cord blood post-vaccination using a pseudotype neutralization assay and calculated placental transfer ratios. A total of 32 pregnant women participated, and 27 were exposed to a biologic medication during pregnancy. Neutralizing antibody titers were similar between biologic-treated and non-treated groups, and biologic-exposed women demonstrated robust placental transfer of neutralizing antibodies. Corticosteroid use during pregnancy was significantly associated with reduced placental transfer efficiency, although this effect was not significant in a sensitivity analysis excluding patients treated with immunomodulators. Vaccination timing and SARS-CoV-2 infection impacted maternal and cord antibody levels, with higher titers observed in those vaccinated before pregnancy or infected during pregnancy. Overall, our findings suggest that upon vaccination, pregnant women with IBD on biologic therapies mount effective SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody responses similar to their non-biologic-exposed counterparts, with efficient placental transfer. These findings support the efficacy of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in this population, though further research with larger cohorts is needed for validation and to explore the long-term protective effects of transferred antibodies in neonates. Furthermore, corticosteroid use, immunomodulator use, and vaccination timing may influence antibody dynamics, underscoring the need for tailored clinical management in this vulnerable population.

Indexed as

Antibodies, ViralBiological ProductsCOVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesInflammatory Bowel DiseasesPregnancy Complications, InfectiousSARS-CoV-2AdultAntibodies, NeutralizingFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancyVaccinationAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralBiological ProductsCOVID-19 Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID41335589
PMCPMC12674510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.