ArticlePloS one2025
Exploring the effect of menstrual loss and dietary habits on iron deficiency in teenagers: A cross-sectional study.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Screening for iron deficiency in young women: the predictive validity of a five-item screening instrument (IRON-5).Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2026Article
- Menstrual-Related Symptoms, Early Menarche, and Their Impact on Sport Participation in Adolescent Floorball Players: A Cross-Sectional Study in Sweden.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- School-based assessment of menstrual irregularities and their predictors among adolescent girls in rural Bangladesh: A cross-sectional study.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2026Article
- Correction: Exploring the effect of menstrual loss and dietary habits on iron deficiency in teenagers: A cross-sectional study.PloS one · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adolescent girls are particularly susceptible to iron deficiency due to increased iron requirements during the pubertal growth spurt, combined with iron loss following menarche. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of heavy menstrual bleeding in an adolescent population using the SAMANTA questionnaire and to explore its relationship with dietary habits and iron deficiency. This cross-sectional study was conducted in two Swedish high schools in 2023. Post-menarchal female students, aged 15 and older, were included (n = 394). Data were collected on-site through a patient-reported survey, including the SAMANTA questionnaire for heavy menstrual bleeding, and by blood sampling. Meat-restricted diet was analyzed in relation to iron status. Descriptive analysis and regression analysis were used to assess the prevalence of heavy menstrual bleeding and its relationship with dietary habits and iron deficiency, defined as ferritin <15 µg/L. The prevalence of heavy menstrual bleeding and iron deficiency in the cohort was 53% (208/394) and 40% (157/394), respectively. In univariate analysis, heavy menstrual bleeding (OR 3.0, 95% CI [2.0, 4.6]) and a meat-restricted diet (OR 3.5, 95% CI [2.2, 5.6]) were both associated with increased odds of iron deficiency. When assessing the joint effect of having heavy menstrual bleeding and a meat-restricted diet, the odds of iron deficiency were 13.5 times higher compared to omnivore individuals with normal menstruation (OR 13.5, 95% CI [6.4, 28.7]). Overall, the prevalence of iron deficiency in this population of adolescent girls was very high. Heavy menstrual bleeding and a meat-restricted diet were both independently associated with increased odds of iron deficiency. However, odds for iron deficiency were monumentally higher when combining these two variables, thus highlighting the importance of assessing and addressing both excessive output and low intake of iron.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.