ArticlePloS one2025
Dietary variability in Middle Holocene South American shellmounds: Insights from isotopic analysis and an adapted Bayesian MixSIAR model.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The degree of homogeneity in the diet of archaeological populations associated with Brazilian shellmounds (sambaquis) is an ongoing debate. Isotopic studies have the potential to document both intra- and inter-group dietary variability, especially when paired with quantitative tools, such as Bayesian Mixing Models. In this study, we investigate intra-site variability on diet at two shellmounds in southeastern Brazil: Piaçaguera (7151-5668 yBP), characterized by two distinct burial clusters, and Moraes (6791-5590 yBP). We analyzed δ13C and δ15N on human and fauna bone collagen (n = 43) and on human dentine collagen (n = 5 teeth). Our data were complemented by previously published isotopic data from these sites (n = 88) and from other Brazilian shellmounds (n = 51). To quantify the consumption of different food sources, we adapted the Bayesian MixSIAR model to integrate both bone and dentine values without compromising sample independence. Our results indicate that marine fish contributed approximately 30-50% to the diet of individuals from Piaçaguera, and terrestrial animals accounted for 16-45% of the diet of individuals from Moraes. We observed a slight difference in the consumption of marine and terrestrial sources between the burial groups in Piaçaguera and a higher intake of freshwater fish among subadults in Moraes. New radiocarbon dating in Piaçaguera indicates that the two burial groups did not belong to distinct chronological periods. These findings highlight the importance of a constant dialog between archaeological and isotopic data. The adapted MixSIAR model validated and increased the robustness of our results, proving to be effective in delineating dietary patterns in past groups from distinct archaeological contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.