Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41335573›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Age is just a number: Examining the preservation of cells and soft tissues in Bothriolepis and other Devonian fish.

Christopher L Rogoff, Paul V Ullmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Christopher L RogoffDepartment of Geology, Rowan University, Glassboro, New Jersey, United States of America.
Paul V UllmannHarold Hamm School of Geology and Geological Engineering, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, North Dakota, United States America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1457-6580

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent microscopy and proteomic studies demonstrate fossil bones can preserve remarkable palimpsests of cellular and soft tissue evolution, yet it remains unclear if there are temporal limits to such preservation. For instance, it remains unknown if fossil cells and soft tissues can be recovered from fossil bones of the earliest vertebrates from the middle Paleozoic. To test this, we demineralized nine bone fragments of Bothriolepis and other Late Devonian fish. Removal of phosphates from the fossils released numerous microstructures morphologically consistent with vertebrate osteocytes, pieces of blood vessels, and sheets of fibrous bone matrix which were frequently found to exhibit elemental chemistry potentially indicative of partial organic composition. These discoveries extend this style of exceptional preservation to aspidin and dentine and predate all prior reports of similar cellular/soft-tissue preservation in fossil bones by nearly 100 million years, indicating that the geologic age of a fossil specimen is a poor predictor of whether or not it will retain potentially-endogenous microstructures. Thus, the preservation pathways leading to these forms of soft-tissue fossilization likely began contemporaneously with the evolution of vascularized cellular bone in the early Paleozoic.

Indexed as

Bone and BonesFishesFossilsAnimalsBiological EvolutionOsteocytes

Identifiers

PMID41335573
PMCPMC12674576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.