Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41335558›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Establishing foundations: Designing a long-term experiment to evaluate whether nestboxes assist population recovery of an endangered species after fire.

Jenna C H Ridley, Kara N Youngentob, Karen Marsh, Maldwyn J Evans, Tyrone Lavery, Kita Ashman, Ana Gracanin, David Lindenmayer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jenna C H RidleyFenner School of Research and Society, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-6630-8361
Kara N YoungentobFenner School of Research and Society, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
Karen MarshResearch School of Biology, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
Maldwyn J EvansFenner School of Research and Society, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
Tyrone LaverySchool of BioSciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Kita AshmanFenner School of Research and Society, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
Ana GracaninFenner School of Research and Society, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
David LindenmayerFenner School of Research and Society, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The loss of hollow-bearing trees drives population declines of hollow-dependent species. Disturbances such as wildfire can exacerbate these declines. Artificial structures, like nestboxes, are a commonly used management tool that attempt to offset hollow loss. However, the effectiveness of nestboxes as a conservation strategy is rarely tested within an experimental framework. The endangered southern greater glider (Petauroides volans) is an obligate hollow-dependent arboreal marsupial that is highly sensitive to wildfire. Southern greater glider populations experienced high mortality and habitat degradation following the 2019/2020 megafires in south-eastern Australia. We established a long-term, landscape-scale experiment to test whether purpose-built nestboxes could assist the post-fire population recovery of the southern greater glider. We installed a total of 234 nestboxes at sites in East Gippsland (north-eastern Victoria) and Tallaganda (southern New South Wales). We matched nestbox sites to control sites. We undertook spotlighting surveys in both study areas and installed camera traps at a subset of nestboxes. We observed southern greater gliders using nestboxes in both regions, with substantially more observations in Tallaganda. These early results did not indicate a significant difference in the relative abundance of southern greater gliders between nestbox and control sites. In Tallaganda, we found more southern greater gliders in areas of lower fire severity. The longer-term outcomes of our study will inform the use of nestboxes as a tool to assist in the recovery of southern greater gliders following disturbance.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesEndangered SpeciesFiresMarsupialiaWildfiresAnimalsEcosystemNesting BehaviorNew South WalesPopulation DynamicsVictoria

Identifiers

PMID41335558
PMCPMC12674562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.