Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41335494›Full record

ReviewDiabetes care2026

The New Obesity Treatment Landscape: Challenges and Opportunities to Promote Shared Decision-Making in People With Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes.

Leah M Schumacher, Sarah Bauerle Bass, Jamy Ard, Daniel J Rubin, Sharon J Herring, Ajay D Rao, Resa M Jones, David B Sarwer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diabetes care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Leah M SchumacherDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Barnett College of Public Health, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA.ORCID 0000-0003-1557-4659
Sarah Bauerle BassDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Barnett College of Public Health, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA.
Jamy ArdDepartment of General Surgery and Weight Management Center, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist, Winston-Salem, NC.
Daniel J RubinSection of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA.
Sharon J HerringCenter for Obesity Research and Education, Barnett College of Public Health, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA.
Ajay D RaoSection of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA.
Resa M JonesDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Barnett College of Public Health, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA.
David B SarwerDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Barnett College of Public Health, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA.

Funding

NHLBI NIH HHS L30HL154167
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

New obesity management guidelines, including those from the American Diabetes Association, advocate the use of shared decision-making (SDM) for obesity treatment. SDM is an evidence-based approach for promoting person-centered care and is widely recommended across medical specialties. However, a variety of issues challenge the use of SDM in daily practice. In this narrative review we discuss factors that may impede the use of SDM in adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes, as well as past efforts to address these barriers. Patient-level factors such as internalized weight bias and lack of knowledge about obesity and its treatment, provider-level factors such as limited training in obesity management and lack of confidence in sensitively discussing weight, and system-level factors like poor treatment access and limited care coordination stymie effective SDM around obesity management. A perceived power imbalance between patients and providers and medical mistrust are additional barriers for some. In the past, researchers have attempted to overcome these barriers to advancing SDM through approaches including patient decision aids, provider training, and clinical decision support systems, with moderate success. This article concludes with recommended strategies for clinical adoption of SDM for patients with obesity and type 2 diabetes, a call for system-level changes to create an environment more conducive to effective SDM, and directions for future research.

Indexed as

Decision Making, SharedDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2ObesityHumansPatient Participation

Identifiers

PMID41335494
PMCPMC13191395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.