Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41335440›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2025

Longitudinal Blood-Based Biomarkers and Clinical Progression in Subjective Cognitive Decline.

Calvin Trieu, Argonde C van Harten, Mardou S S A van Leeuwenstijn, Lisa-Marie Schlüter, Lynn Boonkamp, Azzam Aladdin, Sietske A M Sikkes, Elsmarieke van de Giessen, Inge M W Verberk, Charlotte E Teunissen and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Dementia risk factors and biomarkers in subjective cognitive decline: real world evidence from the monza brain health service.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Epigenetic aging and blood based neurodegeneration markers in LASI-DAD.The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Calvin TrieuAlzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Argonde C van HartenAlzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Mardou S S A van LeeuwenstijnAlzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Lisa-Marie SchlüterAlzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Lynn BoonkampNeurochemistry Laboratory, Department of Clinical Chemistry, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Azzam AladdinNeurochemistry Laboratory, Department of Clinical Chemistry, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Sietske A M SikkesAlzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Elsmarieke van de GiessenDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Inge M W VerberkAlzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Charlotte E TeunissenNeurochemistry Laboratory, Department of Clinical Chemistry, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Wiesje M van der FlierAlzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Blood-based biomarkers identify Alzheimer disease and hold promise for monitoring disease progression, even in the preclinical disease stages. Objective: To investigate longitudinal trajectories of blood-based biomarkers and association with cognitive decline and risk of progression in individuals with subjective cognitive decline (SCD). Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective cohort study (Subjective Cognitive Impairment Cohort) of individuals with SCD evaluated at a memory clinic underwent biennial biomarker collection and annual cognitive assessment and diagnostic evaluation from January 1, 2005, to December 31, 2023, with follow-up through 2023. Exposure: Amyloid status was determined using positron emission tomography or cerebrospinal fluid. Plasma Aβ42/40, phosphorylated tau 217 (pTau217), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), and neurofilament light (NfL) were measured biennially. Main Outcomes and Measures: Cognitive trajectories in memory, attention, language, executive function, and global cognition and clinical progression to mild cognitive impairment or dementia. Results: A total of 298 individuals (mean [SD] age, 61.55 [8.08] years; 174 [58.4%] male) with SCD were included, of whom 80 were amyloid-positive (A+) and 218 were amyloid-negative (A-). Mean (SD) follow-up was 4.8 (2.6) years. Individuals with SCD A+ were older (mean [SD] age, 65.25 [7.14] years; 42 [52.5%] male) than those with SCD A- (mean [SD] age, 60.19 [8.00] years; 132 [60.6%] male). For pTau217, GFAP, and NfL, baseline levels were higher in the A+ group compared with A- group (estimates [SE] amyloid β, 1.11 [0.11], 0.69 [0.13], and 0.36 [0.10], respectively; P < .001 for all). Additionally, these biomarkers showed steeper increases over time in the A+ group than in A- group (estimates [SE] time × amyloid status β, 0.07 [0.02], P < .001; 0.07 [0.02], P < .001; and 0.05 [0.02], P = .005, respectively). Longitudinal increases in pTau217 and GFAP were associated with cognitive decline over time in all domains (β time × biomarker slope = -0.02 to -0.04). Longitudinal decreases in Aβ42/40 and increases in NfL were associated with cognitive decline in global cognition (β = 0.03 [0.01], P = .04) and language (β = 0.04 [0.02], P = .03), and increases in NfL were also associated with decline in global cognition (β = -0.02 [0.01], P = .004), language (β = -0.03 [0.01], P = .007), and executive functioning (β = -0.03 [0.01], P = .02). Steeper pTau217 slope was associated with progression from SCD to mild cognitive impairment or dementia (hazard ratio [HR], 3.6; 95% CI, 1.8-7.4 per 0.05 SD increase per year; C index, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.84-0.93), as were steeper GFAP slope (HR, 1.5 [95% CI, 1.0-2.2]; C index, 0.81 [95% CI, 0.73-0.88]) and steeper NfL slope (HR, 2.6 [95% CI, 1.3-5.2]; C index, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.69-0.85]). Aβ42/40 slope was not associated with progression. Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study of individuals with SCD suggests that longitudinal plasma pTau217 and GFAP are suitable biomarkers for monitoring AD pathology. Their changes were associated with cognitive decline and clinical progression, supporting their potential utility for early intervention and disease monitoring.

Indexed as

BiomarkersCognitive DysfunctionAgedAmyloid beta-PeptidesDisease ProgressionFemaleGlial Fibrillary Acidic ProteinHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedNeurofilament ProteinsPeptide FragmentsProspective Studiestau ProteinsAmyloid beta-PeptidesBiomarkersGFAP protein, humanGlial Fibrillary Acidic Proteinneurofilament protein LNeurofilament ProteinsPeptide Fragmentstau Proteins

Identifiers

PMID41335440
PMCPMC12676364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.