Observational studyJAMA network open2025
Presenteeism Among Health Care Personnel With COVID-19.
Observational study in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Accounting for the long-distance transmission route: An epidemiological model of airborne disease transmission in hospitals.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
56 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Presenteeism-defined as continuing to work during an illness-poses a public health risk in the workplace and is especially hazardous within health care institutions where vulnerable patients may be exposed to nosocomial infections. Understanding the frequency and characteristics of health care personnel (HCP) who report presenteeism while ill with COVID-19 may help mitigate SARS-CoV-2 spread in hospitals and other health care institutions. Objectives: To determine the frequency of presenteeism among HCP with symptomatic COVID-19, and to evaluate the demographic, occupational, and clinical factors associated with it. Design, Setting, and Participants: This is an observational cohort study that uses data from the Preventing Emerging Infections Through Vaccine Effectiveness Testing (PREVENT) project: a test-negative, case-control vaccine effectiveness study that enrolled HCP who had COVID-19 symptoms at 24 academic medical centers from December 2020 through April 2024. Exposure: Exposures include demographic, occupational, and clinical characteristics of participants. Main Outcomes and Measures: Having confirmed symptomatic COVID-19 infection and reporting presenteeism; overall frequency of presenteeism through the study period and the association of the exposure characteristics with presenteeism, adjusting for confounders using 3 multivariable models. Presenteeism was defined as HCP who did not stop working during their illness, but the study did not differentiate whether they continued working remotely. Results: A total of 3721 HCP were included in the analysis (2842 [76.4%] aged 18-49 years; 2993 [80.4%] female; 278 [7.5%] Asian, 406 [10.9%] Black, and 2912 [78.3%] White). Overall, 293 (7.9%) reported presenteeism during the study period, and the frequency of presenteeism increased each year of the study period (from 1 of 73 [1.4%] in 2020 to 16 of 105 [15.2%] in 2024). Presenteeism was associated with HCP who have minimal patient contact (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 3.73; 95% CI, 2.39-4.37), a graduate or professional degree (aOR, 1.90; 95% CI, 1.45-2.50), and income over $100 000 (aOR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.12-2.69). Conclusion and Relevance: In this observational cohort study of 3721 HCP, there was an increasing frequency of presenteeism from 2020 through 2024, and job role and socioeconomic factors were associated. More studies are needed to understand the rationale behind the decision to continue working and the exact causes of presenteeism's rising incidence among HCP with COVID-19.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.