ArticleRheumatology (Oxford, England)2026
Frequency of difficult-to-manage and treatment-refractory axial SpA: insights from the German RABBIT-SpA register using recent ASAS definitions.
Article in Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Observational
- Difficult-to-treat, complex-to-manage, treatment-refractory spondyloarthritis: semantics or substance?Current opinion in rheumatology · 2026Review
- Disease-related and psychosocial factors associated with difficult-to-manage and treatment-refractory axial spondyloarthritis: insights from the Greek AxSpA Registry.Rheumatology international · 2026Article
- Prevalence and clinical factors associated with difficult-to-manage axial spondyloarthritis: a multicentre Italian cohort study with meta-analysis.Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo determine the frequency of axial SpA (axSpA) patients fulfilling the recently proposed Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) definitions for difficult-to-manage (D2M) and treatment-refractory (TR) axSpA, and to characterize these patients at initiation of their first advanced therapy.
methodsData were derived from the ongoing prospective, multicentre, longitudinal German RABBIT-SpA registry. Patients were eligible if they were biologic and targeted synthetic (b/ts) DMARD-naïve, had initiated a b/tsDMARD and had ≥12 months of follow-up. ASAS definitions were applied to identify cases of D2M and TR.
resultsOf 1850 patients with axSpA, 881 (48%) were b/tsDMARD-naïve at the start of observation. A total of 75/881 patients (8.5%) fulfilled the ASAS criteria for D2M and 22/881 (2.5%) additionally met the criteria for TR. At baseline, D2M patients were more frequently female, more often HLA-B27-negative, and more commonly presented with arthritis and enthesitis compared with not-D2M (nD2M) patients. In addition, they exhibited fewer objective inflammatory markers such as elevated CRP or MRI lesions. Opioid use was higher across D2M patients compared with nD2M patients. In the TR group compared with the D2M/nTR, the proportion of female and of obesity was lower. Even at initiation of first-line b/tsDMARD, these patients showed more frequently signs of inflammation, including sacroiliac/spinal MRI lesions and elevated CRP, while peripheral arthritis was less frequent.
conclusionApplying the ASAS definitions in a large real-world cohort identified clinically relevant subgroups with D2M and TR. These findings support their clinical utility and highlight the need for phenotype-specific management strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.