Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41335342›Full record

ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2026

3D volumetric analysis outperforms 2D linear measurements in predicting vision after surgery for epiretinal membranes. An exploratory machine learning study.

Myrta Lippera, George Moussa, Luke Michaels, Jonathan K Y Ng, Assad Jalil, Tsveta Ivanova, Felipe Dhawahir-Scala, Kirti Jasani, Niall Patton

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Myrta LipperaManchester Royal Eye Hospital, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK.
George MoussaManchester Royal Eye Hospital, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK.
Luke MichaelsManchester Royal Eye Hospital, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK.
Jonathan K Y NgManchester Royal Eye Hospital, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK.
Assad JalilManchester Royal Eye Hospital, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK.
Tsveta IvanovaManchester Royal Eye Hospital, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK.
Felipe Dhawahir-ScalaManchester Royal Eye Hospital, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK.
Kirti JasaniManchester Royal Eye Hospital, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK.
Niall PattonManchester Royal Eye Hospital, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK. Niall.Patton@mft.nhs.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8842-1736

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo analyse pre-operative biomarkers, incorporating and comparing two- and three-dimensional (2D/3D) measurements with high multicollinearity, to predict functional outcomes after surgery in eyes affected by epiretinal membranes (ERMs).

methodsThrough the application of machine learning (XGBoost), proficient in handling feature selection and managing multicollinearity, a predictive model for post-surgical best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was developed using clinical and anatomical pre-operative parameters including both 2D (linear) and 3D (volumetric) measurements of the retina. Association between pre-operative parameters, including clinical features and OCT-based linear and volumetric measurements of the retina, and post-operative BCVA in eyes affected by ERMs.

resultsEighty-six eyes were included in the study. In the model, foveal retinal volume was the strongest predictor of post-operative BCVA (SHAP 0.0623logMAR). Furthermore, volumes of the outer and inner retinal layers (SHAP 0.0342 and 0.0221logMAR) demonstrated greater predictive value for final vision than 2D measurements, as well as pre-operative BCVA and presence of ectopic inner foveal layers. Features dependence plots were drawn for the most important features, highlighting the non-linear relationships.

conclusionsUsing machine learning algorithms, we demonstrate 3D models have greater utility than traditional 2D parameters, when predicting visual outcome following ERM surgery and we question previous assumptions about the influence of certain linear parameters on visual outcomes post ERM surgery.

Indexed as

Epiretinal MembraneImaging, Three-DimensionalMachine LearningRetinaTomography, Optical CoherenceVisual AcuityVitrectomyAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative PeriodRetrospective StudiesEpiretinal Membrane (ERM)Machine learningOptical Coherence Tomography (OCT)Predictive prognostic factorsRetinal volumeVolumetric (3D) analysis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.