ArticleAIDS and behavior2026
HIV Testing and Prevention Services in Behavioral Health Organizations: A Multi-method Study Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.
Article in AIDS and behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite the well-established need to increase access to HIV testing and prevention services among people with serious mental illness, little is known about the determinants of implementation of these services in behavioral health organizations. This multi-method study was conducted in King County, Washington, an EHE priority jurisdiction. A quantitative survey of 16 county behavioral health organizations explored the HIV testing and prevention services currently offered. Three organizations that viewed HIV testing and prevention services as very important or essential for their clients participated in in-depth qualitative interviews; 21 staff, providers, and leaders were interviewed about barriers and facilitators to on-site HIV testing and prescription or referral for Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). We used a rapid deductive qualitative analysis approach guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) 2.0. Commonly identified facilitators were organizational culture and a non-judgmental approach to care, frequent contact and long-standing relationships with clients, and a mission to provide holistic care. Commonly identified barriers were lack of resources and trained staff, infrastructure challenges (inability to bill services, weak referral pathways), higher priorities for services (including testing for Hepatitis C and sexually transmitted infections), and lack of knowledge and information. Lack of trained staff and the complexity of the service were more often perceived as barriers to providing PrEP on-site than HIV testing. Opportunities to build capacity were also identified, and included training, implementing universal testing, and expanding partnerships with other organizations to provide HIV testing and prevention services on-site at the behavioral health organization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.