Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41335260›Full record

ArticleJournal of psycholinguistic research2025

Sarcam Use in Polish and Turkish: The Role of Personality, Age and Gender.

Maria Zajączkowska, Katarzyna Branowska, Anna Olechowska, Aleksandra Siemieniuk, Piotr Kałowski, Natalia Banasik-Jemielniak

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of psycholinguistic research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Maria ZajączkowskaInstitute of Psychology, The Maria Grzegorzewska University, Szczęśliwicka 40 street, 02-353, Warsaw, Poland. mkzajaczkowska@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9328-2638
Katarzyna BranowskaInstitute of Psychology, The Maria Grzegorzewska University, Szczęśliwicka 40 street, 02-353, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3356-908X
Anna OlechowskaSchool of Human Sciences, VIZJA University, Warsaw, Poland.
Aleksandra SiemieniukSchool of Human Sciences, VIZJA University, Warsaw, Poland.
Piotr KałowskiSchool of Human Sciences, VIZJA University, Warsaw, Poland.
Natalia Banasik-JemielniakInstitute of Psychology, The Maria Grzegorzewska University, Szczęśliwicka 40 street, 02-353, Warsaw, Poland.

Funding

Narodowe Centrum Nauki 2019/35/D/HS2/01005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The main aim of this paper is to examine the differences in sarcasm use between the two understudied populations from distinct cultures - Polish and Turkish - and to investigate the role of a range of factors that might impact sarcasm use, including the Big Five personality traits, gender and age. The study was conducted online using the Sarcasm Self-Report Scale and The Ten Item Personality Inventory (TIPI). Overall, 332 Polish- and Turkish-speaking participants completed the study. Our key finding was that Polish participants reported more frequent sarcasm use than the Turkish participants. Additionally, men reported higher levels of self-reported sarcasm use compared to women and the effect of gender on sarcasm use did not differ significantly between Poland and Turkey. Finally, in both samples, more frequent sarcasm use was linked to lower agreeableness. Our study serves as a starting point for subsequent analyses of the role of cultural communicative norms and/or personality factors in nonliteral language use.

Indexed as

Cross-Cultural ComparisonLanguagePersonalityAdolescentAdultAge FactorsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPersonality InventoryPolandSex FactorsTurkeyYoung AdultAgreeablenessCulturePersonalitySarcasmVerbal irony

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.