Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41335255›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of ageing2025

Community-based housing alternatives for older adults: towards a conceptual framework for resident involvement.

Luise Stoisser, Tine Buffel, Ann Petermans, An-Sofie Smetcoren

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of ageing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Luise StoisserSociety and Ageing Research Lab (SARLab), Vrije Universiteit Brussels (VUB), Brussels, Belgium. luise.lilo.stoisser@vub.be.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-5252-8439
Tine BuffelDepartment of Sociology, the Manchester Urban Ageing Research Group (MUARG), The University of Manchester, Manchester, England.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3780-1103
Ann PetermansFaculty of Architecture and Arts, Research Group ARCK-Designing for More, Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7023-4628
An-Sofie SmetcorenSociety and Ageing Research Lab (SARLab), Vrije Universiteit Brussels (VUB), Brussels, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4581-4898

Funding

Leverhulme Trust RL-2019-011Marie Sklodowska-Curie Action HOMeAGE - Advancing Research and Training on Ageing, Place and Home 101073506
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most older adults in Europe want to age in their own homes. However, this is not feasible or desirable for everyone. Limited financial resources, lack of daily support or social contact, the sudden loss of a partner, or a desire for change may result in a wish or necessity to move. Community-based housing alternatives, such as co-housing, naturally occurring retirement communities (NORCs), sheltered housing, or villages, can provide viable options. These initiatives facilitate independent living, care and support, and a sense of community. Compared to institutionalised care homes, community-based housing offers autonomy, independent living, and the opportunity to shape one's home environment. However, despite variation in how residents participate in co-producing their living environments, the role of resident involvement in shaping community-based housing has been underexplored. To address this gap, this paper proposes a conceptual framework for understanding how older residents engage in co-producing community-based housing. Bringing together literature on housing co-production and community-based housing for older adults, the framework distinguishes between community-led and community-oriented co-production. Community-led co-production refers to practices that are controlled by older residents, while community-oriented co-production describes practices that include resident input, but led by other stakeholders. By developing and discussing this framework, the paper lays the groundwork for future empirical studies and offers guidance for policymakers, practitioners, and housing providers on considering the role of residents in shaping future housing models for older adults.

Indexed as

Ageing in placeCommunity-based housingCo-productionGovernance

Identifiers

PMID41335255
PMCPMC12675851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.