ArticleJournal of molecular modeling2025
Benchmarking CuₙO (n = 1, 2) complexes via ab initio methods: structural, electronic, and thermodynamic insights with biochemical relevance.
Article in Journal of molecular modeling, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
contextCopper is an essential trace element that plays a central role in redox chemistry and electron transfer processes in biological systems. To gain a deeper understanding of the electronic behavior of copper species, we carried out a comparative evaluation of the Cu
methodsThis study employed density functional theory (DFT) alongside thermodynamic cycles to assess the stability of Cu(Indo)₂ and Cu₂(Indo)₄ complexes in ethanol solution. To select suitable computational methods, a benchmark was conducted using Cu(II)/acetate complexes as reference systems. A total of fifteen DFT functionals-BPW91, PBE, B97D, revTPSS, M06-L, M11-L, B3LYP, BHandHLYP, PBE0, ωB97XD, APDF, M06, M06-2X, M06-HF, and TPSSh-were tested in combination with four basis sets: Def2-SVP, Def2-TZVP, 6-31 + G(d,p), and 6-311 + G(d,p). The most reliable functional-basis set combinations were then applied to the copper-indomethacin complexes. In addition, electronic and structural properties of Cu₂ and CuO-such as ionization potentials, electron affinities, vibrational frequencies, equilibrium bond lengths, and spin or magnetic coupling constants-were calculated. Computational results were validated through comparison with available experimental data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.