Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41335229›Full record

ArticleHistory and philosophy of the life sciences2025

Early transitions in the evolution of cognition.

Arsham Nejad Kourki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in History and philosophy of the life sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Arsham Nejad KourkiFrancis Crick Institute, 1 Midland Rd, London, NW1 1AT, UK. arsham.nejadkourki@crick.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4508-4653

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper examines the early evolution of cognition in animals through the lens of the Transitions in Structural Complexity approach. By focusing on the emergence and transformation of coordination systems, the study identifies three progressive stages: collective, specialised, and integrated coordination. Each stage is characterised by distinct structural innovations-ranging from contractile epithelia and cytoskeletal coupling to the development of neurons, neurosecretory cells, and integrated nervous tissues-and is shaped by the processes of modularisation, subfunctionalisation, and integration. By conceptualising coordination as a transferable biological function, this approach offers an analysis of the evolution of this capacity without presupposing specific mechanisms or structures. Rather than defining cognition in advance, this approach tracks how functions associated with cognition become structurally embodied in multicellular systems through the progressive reorganisation of coordination across levels of biological organisation. Besides offering a general schema for analysing the early stages of cognitive evolution in metazoans, this approach has broader implications for the comparative study of cognition and the structural focus within the major evolutionary transitions framework.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionCognitionAnimalsComplex multicellularityCoordination systemEvolution of cognitionMajor evolutionary transitionsNervous system evolutionStructural complexity

Identifiers

PMID41335229
PMCPMC12675608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.