Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41335187›Full record

SynthesisClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2026

Machine learning models for predicting response to epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer brain metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Bardia Hajikarimloo, Ibrahim Mohammadzadeh, Rana Hashemi, Salem Mohammed Tos, Ehsan Bahrami, Dorsa Najari, Azin Ebrahimi, Arman Hasanzade, Mohammad Amin Habibi

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Bardia Hajikarimloo *Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA. bardii47@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8801-1158
Ibrahim Mohammadzadeh *Skull Base Research Center, Loghman-Hakim Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Rana HashemiDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Shohada Tajrish Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Salem Mohammed TosDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Ehsan BahramiDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Shohada Tajrish Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Dorsa NajariDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Shohada Tajrish Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Azin EbrahimiDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Shohada Tajrish Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Arman HasanzadeDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Shohada Tajrish Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mohammad Amin HabibiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPredicting clinical and radiological outcomes of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and brain metastases (BMs) is crucial for effective patient management. Machine learning (ML)-based models have increasingly been utilized to predict EGFR-TKI response in patients with lung cancer brain metastasis (LCBM). In this study, we aimed to evaluate the predictive performance of ML-based models for EGFR-TKI response prediction.

methodsA comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science from database inception to April 25, 2025. Studies that developed ML-based models to predict EGFR-TKI response were included.

resultsEight studies involving 1322 LCBM patients were included. The included studies used logistic regression (LR), LR with least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), decision tree (DT), and a Cox-based deep learning model (DL-Cox). The meta-analysis revealed a pooled area under the curve (AUC) of 0.84 (95% CI 0.78-0.91) and accuracy (ACC) of 0.75 (95% CI 0.62-0.88) with a sensitivity (SEN) of 0.82 (95% CI 0.77-0.87) and a specificity (SPE) of 0.73 (95% CI 0.66-0.80) for prediction of EGFR-TKI response. The meta-analysis of diagnostic odds ratios (DOR) exhibited a pooled DOR of 12.41 (95% CI 7.32-21.04).

conclusionsML-based models show promising ability to predict EGFR-TKI response in LCBM, supporting their potential to guide treatment selection. However, their use in clinical practice remains limited by small retrospective datasets and lack of external validation.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsMachine LearningProtein Kinase InhibitorsErbB ReceptorsHumansTyrosine Kinase InhibitorsEGFR protein, humanErbB ReceptorsProtein Kinase InhibitorsTyrosine Kinase InhibitorsDeep learningLung neoplasmsMachine learningTyrosine kinase inhibitors

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.