ReviewCurrent hematologic malignancy reports2025
The Evolving Therapeutic Landscape of Richter Transformation.
Review in Current hematologic malignancy reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Precision Medicine in Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma: Advances in BTK Inhibition, CD30-Directed Antibody-Drug Conjugates, and HDAC-Mediated Epigenetic Therapy with Pirtobrutinib, Brentuximab Vedotin, and Belinostat.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Molecular Pathogenesis and Targeted Treatment of Richter Transformation.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Glofitamab in the sequential treatment of relapsed/refractory B-Cell lymphoma: a single-center real-world study.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewRichter transformation (RT), the progression of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) to aggressive lymphomas, poses a significant therapeutic challenge with historically poor outcomes. Chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) regimens have demonstrated limited efficacy with short durations of response. This review aims to evaluate the evolving treatment landscape for RT, with a focus on recent advances in targeted therapies, immunotherapies, and cellular therapies that are redefining the current and future standards of care. RECENT
findingsThe treatment paradigm for RT is rapidly shifting away from cytotoxic chemotherapy. The combination of the B-cell lymphoma 2 inhibitor venetoclax with CIT has emerged as a new first-line benchmark with promising response rates and overall survival. Covalent Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors had modest activity as monotherapy but showed improved responses when given with an immune checkpoint inhibitor. Pirtobrutinib has demonstrated responses even in heavily pretreated patients. Furthermore, advancement in immunotherapy has expanded treatment options for this patient population with bispecific T-cell engagers achieving high response rates and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy providing deep, durable responses and favorable median overall survival in the relapsed/refractory (R/R) setting. The therapeutic landscape for RT has broadened with the introduction of targeted agents and immunotherapy. Venetoclax-based regimens represent a new standard for chemotherapy-eligible patients, allowing for a more effective bridge to potentially curative consolidation with transplantation. For R/R disease, novel BTK inhibitors, bispecific antibodies, and cellular therapies are demonstrating substantial efficacy. Ongoing trials investigating combinations of these agents are poised to further transform RT management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41335170What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.