Trial reportLasers in medical science2025
"Laser assisted gingival melanin depigmentation using diode 450 nm; ablative vs. non-ablative techniques: randomized clinical trial".
Trial report in Lasers in medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Plant Exosome Injection: A New Boost for Postlaser Vascular Repair.The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gingival pigmentation is a common cosmetic concern that can negatively impact a patient's smile aesthetics. Laser-assisted depigmentation has emerged as a reliable and effective treatment modality. The study aimed to compare the efficacy, comfortability of the patient, and the post-operative outcomes among patients who underwent either an ablative or a non-ablative diode 450 nm laser for gingival depigmentation. A split-mouth, single-blind, randomized controlled trial was conducted on 20 subjects exhibiting physiological pigmentation scores of 2 or more, as assessed by the Dummett index. A diode laser emitting 450 nm wavelength was employed. One side of each subject's mouth was randomly assigned to receive ablative laser treatment, while the contralateral side received non-ablative treatment. Primary outcome measures included changes in Oral Pigmentation Index and Melanin Pigmentation Index scores at baseline and at 1, 6, and 12 months' post-treatment. Patient perception of pain and discomfort was assessed using a modified McGill Pain Questionnaire. Both ablative and non-ablative techniques demonstrated significant reductions in OPI and MPI scores at all follow-up time points. Immediate and total depigmentation was achieved using ablative techniques, which showed fewer rates of re-pigmentation but higher intraoperative discomfort. In contrast, non-ablative techniques result in less pain but required more sessions to obtain optimal results. The choice of technique should be individualized based on patient preferences and clinician expertise. Non-ablative treatment may be preferred for patients seeking minimal discomfort and rapid healing, while ablative treatment may be suitable for patients who prioritize complete pigment removal in one session.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41335139What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.