ArticleAPMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica2025
Large-Scale Study Comparing Analytical and Diagnostic Quality of Three HPV Self-Sampling Devices for At-Home Cervical Cancer Screening.
Article in APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Large-Scale Study Comparing Analytical and Diagnostic Quality of Three HPV Self-Sampling Devices for At-Home Cervical Cancer Screening.APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Elimination of cervical cancer requires broad access to and participation in cervical screening. Self-sampling has emerged as a robust technology that simplifies access; however, few self-sampling devices are independently validated regarding sample quality. This study compares the quality of three self-sampling devices: Evalyn (Rovers), currently used in Denmark, the FLOQSwab (Copan) and the modified FLOQSwab: SensiGrip. Women residing in the Capital Region of Denmark, accepting screening by self-sampling, were offered a kit containing the following combinations of devices: (1) Evalyn, FLOQSwab, (2) Evalyn, SensiGrip or (3) FLOQSwab, SensiGrip. Returned kits were analyzed using the validated BD Onclarity HPV assay on the COR instrument (BD). A total of 1677 women participated. Sample quality was similar across devices, also when stratifying into age groups. Two hundred thirty-two women (13.9%) tested positive for one or more oncogenic HPV types. Pairwise concordance analysis for each group showed an overall agreement between 93.5% and 95%. Analytical and diagnostic performance of samples collected by the three self-sampling devices resulted in similar quality and HPV detection. Hence the sample quality is not a determinant in the choice of sampling device and focus on other factors such as cost, women's preference or size and weight can take precedence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.