Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41334640›Full record

SynthesisActa otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale2025

The nature of nasal discharge in chronic rhinosinusitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis using patient-reported outcomes.

Ethan M Kallenberger, Asher T Ripp, Shaun A Nguyen, Erin E Briggs, Alexander N Duffy, Isabella V Schafer, Jess C Mace, Timothy L Smith, Zachary M Soler, Rodney J Schlosser

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Acta otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ethan M KallenbergerDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, USA.
Asher T RippDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, USA.
Shaun A NguyenDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, USA.
Erin E BriggsDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, USA.
Alexander N DuffyDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, USA.
Isabella V SchaferDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, USA.
Jess C MaceDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, USA.
Timothy L SmithDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, USA.
Zachary M SolerDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, USA.
Rodney J SchlosserDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study is to answer the question "What is the most common and severe type of nasal discharge in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) at baseline as measured by patient-reported outcomes?". Methodology: Two independent reviewers evaluated studies for inclusion, extracted data from included studies, and performed critical appraisal of studies. Data on the four Sino-Nasal Outcome Test 22 (SNOT22) discharge questions, demographic, and comorbidity data was collected. Meta-analysis of single means and proportions was performed for demographic, comorbidity, severity, and prevalence data. Results: A total of 53 studies (n = 6584) were included for analysis. Postnasal drip (PND) was the most severe symptom (2.6, 95%CI: 2.2-3) and most prevalent (80.7%, 95%CI: 53.0-97.7). Patients without nasal polyps had a higher PND score than those with polyps (2.56 vs 2.40, 95%CI: 0.1-0.2). However, patients with polyps reported higher symptom scores for need to blow nose, runny nose, and thick nasal discharge (all p < 0.0001). Conclusions: CRS patients experience PND at a higher prevalence and severity at baseline than the other three forms of nasal discharge captured by the SNOT22. Polyp status influences differing symptoms of nasal drainage. Comorbid asthma or allergies are associated with more severe PND and total SNOT22 scores.

Indexed as

Patient Reported Outcome MeasuresRhinitisSinusitisChronic DiseaseHumansRhinosinusitisprevalencequality of liferhinosinusitissino-nasal outcome test

Identifiers

PMID41334640
PMCPMC12673938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.