ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2025
The vaccination status and attitudes toward human papillomavirus among gynecologists in China: A cross-sectional survey.
Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gynecologists are the main group promoting vaccines. Previous studies have paid less attention to their human papillomavirus(HPV) vaccination status.Understanding their acceptance and true attitudes toward vaccines, as well as the reasons for not getting vaccinated, is of great significance for promoting vaccines. A cross-sectional survey was conducted from June to August 2024 across six Chinese cities by the Cancer Endocrinology Committee of the Chinese Anti-Cancer Association, using a convenience sampling strategy to distribute questionnaires to gynecologists in tertiary public hospitals. Results were presented as case numbers (percentages), with group comparisons made using either the χ
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.