Trial reportChinese medical journal2026
Stool-based methylated syndecan-2 test and fecal immunochemical test for advanced colorectal neoplasia screening in the Chinese population: A multicenter randomized noncomparative study.
Trial report in Chinese medical journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04221854 (Stool-based SDC2 DNA Methylation Test vs. Fecal Immunochemical Test on the Detection of Colorectal Advanced Adenomatous Polyps and Cancer in Chinese Population), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Stool-based SDC2 DNA Methylation Test vs. Fecal Immunochemical Test on the Detection of Colorectal Advanced Adenomatous Polyps and Cancer in Chinese Population: A Multi-central Randomized Clinical Trial
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundColorectal cancer (CRC) is among the most prevalent malignancies, with an increasing incidence in China, posing increasing challenges to current screening strategies. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of a screening strategy based on the stool-based methylated Syndecan-2 gene (mSDC2) test for detecting advanced colorectal neoplasia in the Chinese population.
methodsIn this multicenter randomized study, participants aged 45-80 years and identified through community screening were randomized to take either the mSDC2 test or a fecal immunochemical test (FIT), and those with positive results were referred for colonoscopy between 2020 and 2022. The primary outcome was the detection rate of advanced colorectal neoplasia, including advanced adenoma, advanced serrated polyps, and CRC. The secondary outcome was adherence to colonoscopy. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to evaluate colonoscopy adherence among participants with positive stool-based test results.
resultsA total of 44,475 eligible participants were enrolled from 189 communities (93 in the mSDC2 test group and 96 in the FIT group). In the mSDC2 test group ( n = 21,854), the detection rate of advanced neoplasia was 0.53% ( n = 115), including 93 (0.43%) advanced adenomas, 8 (0.04%) advanced serrated polyps, and 17 (0.08%) CRC cases. In the FIT group ( n = 22,621), the detection rate of advanced neoplasia was 0.47% ( n = 106), including 71 (0.31%) advanced adenomas, 9 (0.04%) advanced serrated polyps, and 29 (0.13%) CRC cases. In addition, adherence to colonoscopy was greater in the mSDC2 test group (35.6% vs. 26.4%; odds ratio: 1.59, 95% confidence interval: 1.36-1.87; P <0.001).
conclusionsThis study revealed the effectiveness of the mSDC2 test and FIT in detecting advanced colorectal neoplasia in a large Chinese population in a real-world setting, and indicated a possible improvement in adherence to colonoscopy for the mSDC2 test. Further studies with improved comparability and longer follow-up are warranted to clarify its clinical utility. REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov , No. NCT04221854.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.