Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41334594›Full record

ArticleHealth promotion international2025

Early generational and partisan divides in vaccine acceptance in USA during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Ginger Alonso, Spencer Kiesel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health promotion international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ginger AlonsoDepartment of Political Science, California State University, 400 W. First Street, Chico, CA 95929, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7596-6921
Spencer KieselUniversity of Cincinnati, School of Public and International Affairs, 2600 Clifton Avenue, Cincinnati, OH 45221  United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1722-4409

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Partisanship is a factor behind COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in USA. A growing body of research indicates that conservative Republicans demonstrate greater vaccine hesitancy than their liberal Democratic counterparts. Importantly, older adults tend to be more conservative yet exhibit less vaccine hesitancy overall. Accordingly, this study investigates age as a moderating factor in early vaccine attitudes, addressing a gap in the current literature. Leveraging protection motivation theory and data from the Collaborative Multiracial Post-Election Survey (N = 15 000), our analysis suggests that the relationship between partisanship and COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy is conditioned by age, as measured both continuously and categorically through generational cohorts. Our primary contribution is the finding of no partisanship effect on the oldest cohort of Americans in the earliest days of COVID-19 vaccine implementation. For adults from the Silent Generation, partisanship has no systematic effect on COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. Furthermore, for younger partisans, vaccination attitudes are more closely tied to political identity than previously known. Our findings uncover generational diversity and provide novel insight into vaccine hesitancy across age and partisanship. Examining age interactions is crucial since age is a major risk factor for many infectious diseases worldwide. Understanding this relationship is essential to ensure that vaccine campaigns are targeted in the most effective way. We present an important contribution that is intersectional in nature, furthering research in both health behavior and politics.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesPoliticsVaccination HesitancyAdolescentAdultAgedAge FactorsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Surveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesCOVID-19 VaccinesageCOVID-19pandemicpartisanshipvaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID41334594
PMCPMC12673329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.