ArticleFrontiers in physiology2025
An EEG-based machine learning framework for diagnosing acute sleep deprivation.
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Study objective: Acute sleep deprivation significantly impacts cognitive function, contributes to accidents, and increases the risk of chronic illnesses, underscoring the need for reliable and objective diagnosis. Our work aims to develop a machine learning-based approach to discriminate between EEG recordings from acutely sleep-deprived individuals and those that are well-rested, facilitating the objective detection of acute sleep deprivation and enabling timely intervention to mitigate its adverse effects. Methods: Sixty-one-channel eyes-open resting-state electroencephalography (EEG) data from a publicly available dataset of 71 participants were analyzed. Following preprocessing, EEG recordings were segmented into contiguous, non-overlapping 20-second epochs. For each epoch, a comprehensive set of features was extracted, including statistical descriptors, spectral measures, functional connectivity indices, and graph-theoretic metrics. Four machine learning classifiers - Light Gradient-Boosting Machine (LightGBM), eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Random Forest (RF), and Support Vector Classifier (SVC) - were trained on these features using nested stratified cross-validation to ensure unbiased performance evaluation. In parallel, three deep learning models-a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), Long Short-Term Memory network (LSTM), and Transformer-were trained directly on the raw multi-channel EEG time-series data. All models were evaluated under two conditions: (i) without subject-level separation, allowing the same participant to contribute to both training and test sets, and (ii) with subject-level separation, where models were tested exclusively on unseen participants. Model performance was assessed using accuracy, F1-score, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results: Without subject-level separation, CNN achieved the highest accuracy (95.72%), followed by XGBoost (95.42%), LightGBM (94.83%), RF (94.53%), and SVC (85.25%), with the Transformer (77.39%) and LSTM (66.75%) models achieving lower accuracies. Under subject-level separation, RF achieved the highest accuracy (68.23%), followed by XGBoost (66.36%), LightGBM (66.21%), CNN (65.35%), and SVC (65.08%), while the Transformer (63.35%) and LSTM (61.70%) models achieved the lowest accuracies. Conclusion: This study demonstrates the potential of EEG-based machine learning for detecting acute sleep deprivation, while underscoring the challenges of achieving robust subject-level generalization. Despite reduced accuracy under cross-subject evaluation, these findings support the feasibility of developing scalable, non-invasive tools for sleep deprivation detection using EEG and advanced ML techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.