ArticleFrontiers in physiology2025
Associations between body mass index and lung function using Z-scores: a nonlinear relationship and machine learning classification modeling.
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This study systematically investigated the relationship between body mass index (BMI) and lung function, incorporating Z-scores, thereby offering a novel approach to lung function management. Methods: Data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES, 2007-2012) were utilized, encompassing composite measures of lung function, diet, BMI, smoking history, dust exposure, heart failure, asthma, chronic bronchitis, tuberculosis, a history of thoracic surgery and other relevant covariates. Lung function Z-scores were calculated, and their associations were evaluated using multiple linear regression, logistic regression, and restricted cubic spline models. A total of 12,783 participants were included, with participants categorized into four groups based on forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) Z-scores, forced vital capacity (FVC) Z-scores and FEV1/FVC Z-scores: the Z1group, representing the normal lung function group (n = 10,760), the Z2 group, representing the obstructive ventilatory defect group (n = 1,300), the Z3 group, representing the restrictive ventilatory defect group (n = 597), and the Z4 group, representing the mixed ventilatory defect group (n = 126). Subgroup analyses were also performed. We captured the complex relationships between BMI and lung function by developing 22 derived features, employing the Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique (SMOTE) to address class imbalance, and training and comparing seven machine learning algorithms. Results: Among 12,783 participants (mean age 46 years, 51% male), 10,760 had normal lung function, 1,300 had obstructive ventilatory defect (OVD), 597 had restrictive ventilatory defect (RVD), and 126 had mixed defect. BMI demonstrated opposing associations with ventilatory defects: higher BMI was inversely associated with OVD risk (Q4 vs. Q1: OR = 0.532, 95% CI 0.418-0.678, P < 0.0001), but positively associated with RVD risk (Q4 vs. Q1: OR = 2.900, 95% CI 2.708-4.048, P < 0.0001). Restricted cubic spline analysis revealed a U-shaped relationship for RVD, with a threshold at 26.39 kg/m Conclusion: This study reveals differential and opposing associations between BMI and ventilatory impairment phenotypes, with higher BMI inversely associated with obstructive defects but positively associated with restrictive defects. Moreover, strong correlations were validated through extensive adjustments and machine learning models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.