Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41334470›Full record

ReviewJugan geon-gang gwa jilbyeong2023

[Improvement of the Approval System for the Development and Experimentation of Living Modified Organisms in Synthetic Biology].

Soo Rin Kim, Wooseong Kim, Soo-Jin Yeom, Kwon-Young Choi, Yoonju Shin, Jeonghwa Shin, Ji-Sook Hahn

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
In one paragraph

Review in Jugan geon-gang gwa jilbyeong, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Soo Rin Kim경북대학교 식품공학부.
Wooseong Kim이화여자대학교 약학대학 약학과.
Soo-Jin Yeom전남대학교 생명과학기술학부.
Kwon-Young Choi아주대학교 환경안전공학과.
Yoonju Shin질병관리청 의료안전예방국 생물안전평가과.
Jeonghwa Shin질병관리청 의료안전예방국 생물안전평가과.
Ji-Sook Hahn서울대학교 화학생물공학부.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The advancement of synthetic biology and its expanding influence on future industries has given rise to a growing need to deregulate the development and experimentation of living modified organisms (LMOs) created by synthetic biology. This article aims to explore the current state of laws and regulations governing synthetic biology-related LMOs and identify trends in the development and experimentation of LMOs. Based on this analysis, we propose a plan for the improvement of the national approval system for LMO development and experimentation that both ensures the safety of LMO research and revitalizes related research.

Indexed as

Improvement of national approval systemLiving modified organismSynthetic biology

Identifiers

PMID41334470
PMCPMC12480396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.