ArticleInternational journal of surgery protocols2025
Evaluation of the effect of virtual reality hypnosis on pain through attentional diversion during prostate biopsies under local anesthesia (HYPNOSURG-VR): a study protocol.
Article in International journal of surgery protocols, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Prostate cancer is the second most commonly diagnosed cancer in men worldwide. Prostate biopsies are essential for diagnosis but often induce significant pain and anxiety despite local anesthesia. Virtual reality (VR) has emerged as a promising non-pharmacological tool for pain management during medical procedures. This study aims to assess the effect of virtual reality hypnosis (VRH) as an adjunct to standard local anesthesia during prostate biopsies. Methods: This single-center, prospective, randomized, controlled, parallel-group, single-blind trial will compare standard prostate biopsies under local anesthesia with and without VRH. A total of 130 patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either standard care with local anesthesia alone or standard care plus VRH. The VRH will be initiated 15 minutes pre-procedure and continue throughout. The primary outcome is the maximum pain assessed using a 0-10 Numerical Pain Rating Scale immediately post-procedure by a blinded assessor. Secondary outcomes include post-procedure pain, anxiety, physiological stress response, immersion level, patient satisfaction, procedural success, additional analgesia needs, procedure duration, and adverse events. Follow-up will occur at 1 month. Discussion: This trial will provide high-quality evidence regarding VRH effectiveness as a non-pharmacological adjunct for pain management during prostate biopsies. By targeting both anticipatory anxiety and procedural pain, this approach may significantly improve patient comfort. If effective, this technique could transform the standard of care for prostate biopsies and potentially extend to other invasive urological procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.