Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41334400›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2025

Impact of urban green spaces on mental restoration in older adults: a perspective based on subjective perception.

Jianjian Zhang, Ziyi Tan, Fanyue Bu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jianjian ZhangCollege of Art and Design, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Ziyi TanCollege of Art and Design, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Fanyue BuCollege of Art and Design, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: This study investigates the impact of urban green spaces (UGSs) on mental restoration among older adults. It contributes to the development of age-friendly urban green spaces that are more inclusive and promote health. Materials and methods: Data were collected via surveys conducted in five distinct UGSs in Nanjing, China. The Perceived Sensory Dimensions (PSDs) were used to evaluate the qualities of these green spaces, while the Perceived Restorativeness Scale (PRS) assessed older adults' mental restoration. Multivariate linear regression analyses were conducted to examine the effects of UGS quality on mental restoration in older adults. Results: Four dimensions of the PSDs-culture, social, rich in species, and serene-had a positive effect on mental restoration in older adults. Gender-specific analysis showed that culture, rich in species and serene, positively impacted mental restoration in both genders. Conversely, the social dimension had a positive effect on older men, while refuge positively affected older women. Age-specific analysis showed that culture, social, and serene positively influenced mental restoration among participants aged 60-79 years, while species richness positively influenced mental restoration among those aged 60-69 years. Conclusion: Our findings reveal that specific environmental features of UGSs positively influence mental restoration in older adults. Moreover, the effects of environmental features on mental restoration varied by age and gender. Based on these findings, we propose four key considerations for designing UGSs.

Indexed as

Mental HealthParks, RecreationalUrban PopulationAgedChinaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and Questionnairesenvironmental featuresmental restorationolder adultsperceived sensory dimensionsurban green space

Identifiers

PMID41334400
PMCPMC12665573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.