ArticleCase reports in plastic surgery & hand surgery2025
Long-term follow-up after en bloc resection of the distal radius with reconstruction using ulnar translocation.
Article in Case reports in plastic surgery & hand surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reconstruction of the distal radius after en bloc bone tumor resection is challenging. Among various surgical reconstruction methods, ulnar translocation is a simple approach that does not require vascular anastomosis, autograft harvesting, or prosthesis preparation. This report describes the 7-year follow-up of a patient who underwent reconstruction with ulnar translocation following resection of a recurrent giant cell tumor of the bone. A 57-year-old woman was diagnosed with multiple recurrent giant cell tumor of the bone involving the distal radius. The patient underwent en bloc resection of the tumor with osteotomy of the distal radius 5 cm proximal to the wrist joint through a dorsal incision. The distal ulna was osteotomized at the same level and translocated with preservation of the vascularity of the posterior interosseous artery. Then, the translocated ulna was fixed to the carpal bone and distal radius and aligned in the mid-supination and pronation positions; fixation at 10° of wrist dorsiflexion was performed using locking plates. Bone union between the metacarpal bone, grafted bone and proximal radius was achieved at 9 months postoperatively. At the 1-year follow-up examination, the range of motion of the wrist was 90°/65° (supination/pronation), and the grip strength was 9.1 kg. At the final follow-up examination (7 years postoperatively), the range of motion of the wrist was 90°/90° (supination/pronation) and the grip strength was 19 kg (20 kg on the lateral side). The patient's QuickDASH and Hand 20 scores were 25 and 43, respectively, indicating minor difficulties in daily activities. Ulnar translocation is regarded as a practical alternative to more complex reconstructive procedures for the distal radius following en bloc tumor resection. Its benefits include surgical simplicity, long-term durability, and preservation of forearm rotation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.