ArticleJPRAS open2025
Evaluating the current research landscape in gender-affirming surgery.
Article in JPRAS open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Research on gender-affirming surgery (GAS) is essential to advancing and optimizing surgical techniques, understanding long-term outcomes, and reducing health disparities. Multidisciplinary collaboration is crucial for optimal outcomes after GAS, but whether published studies reflect the multidisciplinary nature of clinical care is unknown. We sought to evaluate which specialties are publishing the most, the most published types of GAS, and the current trends in GAS research in order to elucidate the rapid growth of GAS. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study of all GAS research articles published on PubMed from March 2010, the year the Affordable Care Act was implemented, to 2022. For each article, we recorded senior author specialty, type of GAS investigated, year of publication, journal name, and funding source. Results: Of the 764 articles analyzed, the most were published on FFS (20.9 %) and vaginoplasty (20.6 %), with the fewest on metoidioplasty (2.88 %) ( Conclusion: Research on GAS has increased significantly since the passage of the Affordable Care Act. Given that plastic surgeons published the most and had the greatest increase in publications amongst all specialties may reflect the fact that plastic surgeons comprise 79.5 % of gender-affirming surgeons in the United States. GAS is a rapidly expanding surgical field given its significant increase in publications over the past decade.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.