ReviewBioactive materials2026
Barrier-disrupting microneedle technology: Overcoming physical, physiological, and pathological skin defenses to enhance therapeutic efficacy.
Review in Bioactive materials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mechanisms and therapeutic design of stimuli-responsive vesicular nanocarriers for melanoma.International journal of pharmaceutics: X · 2026Review
- Bionic intelligent responsive barbed microneedles synergistically remodel the microenvironment for the treatment of refractory pigmentation disorders (melasma).Materials today. Bio · 2026Article
- Molecular Dynamics Simulation and Characterization of GelMA/HA Composite Microneedles for Potential Growth Hormone Transdermal Delivery.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Bionic microneedles: Design inspired by bionics and its applications in medicine.International journal of pharmaceutics: X · 2026Review
- Where and when to strike: Spatiotemporally controlled smart nanomedicines for precision antibacterial therapy.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2026Review
- A paradigm shift from penetration: Material-based solutions for multidimensional spatiotemporal, hypoxic, and optical challenges in cutaneous photodynamic therapy.Materials today. Bio · 2026Review
- Biomedical Technologies for Androgenic Alopecia Treatment: Advance, Mechanism and Future Direction.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Review
- Root-system-inspired core-shell microneedles enable spatiotemporal sequential therapy via ROS scavenging, angiogenesis, and capillary-driven lipid removal for enhanced fat graft survival.Burns & trauma · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microneedles (MNs) have gained increasing attention as an advanced transdermal delivery platform owing to their enhanced delivery performance compared to traditional systems. The key to enhancing MNs efficacy lies in overcoming multiple skin barriers that hinder efficient skin insertion and drug permeation: (1) Physical barriers, such as the tough stratum corneum and skin elasticity, impede complete MN insertion; (2) Physiological barriers, including the extracellular matrix (ECM) and biofilms, limit drug diffusion into deeper skin layers for optimal absorption; (3) Pathological microenvironments lead to uncontrollable drug release and insufficient drug accumulation in target tissue. In this review, we outline strategies to address these barriers for improved therapeutic outcomes. First, we discuss optimization approaches for MN geometry, administration methods, and separation performance to enhance skin penetration efficiency. Next, we explore passive (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.