ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2025
Machine learning predicts lipid emulsion stability in parenteral nutrition using multi-laboratory literature data.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Physical instability of lipid in parenteral nutrition (PN) poses significant clinical safety risks. As lipid stability is influenced by multiple complex factors and remains incompletely characterized, this study aimed to quantify the relative importance of stability determinants and to develop a machine learning (ML) model for predicting stability in individualized PN prescriptions. Methods: A retrospective meta-analysis integrated experimental data from multi-laboratory studies. The ML framework employed transfer learning for cross-laboratory data harmonization and Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique (SMOTE) for class imbalance mitigation. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) and accuracy. Results: The datasets comprised 17 stability-related features (electrolytes, macronutrients, and storage conditions) extracted from 1,518 samples representing 872 unique PN formulations across 19 studies (2000 and 2024). The XGBoost model achieved exceptional predictive performance (accuracy: 98.2%, AUC 0.968). SHAP-based feature importance analysis identified the concentrations of Amino and phosphate, storage time and lipid composition as key stability determinants. Conclusion: This study establishes the first interpretable ML framework for predicting lipid emulsions stability in PN, resolving cross-laboratory data heterogeneity. We have provided a high-accuracy prediction tool for assessing lipid emulsion stability in PN, while the methodology demonstrates generalizability for stability studies of complex drugs and nutrients formulations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.