Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41334335›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2025

Diets optimized for environmental sustainability and health: implications for diet costs across socio-economic positions for Dutch adults.

Reina E Vellinga, Samantha N Heerschop, Sander Biesbroek, Pieter van 't Veer, Jose Drijvers, Marieke van Bakel, Anne Hollander, Elisabeth H M Temme

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Reina E VellingaNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment (Netherlands), Bilthoven, Netherlands.
Samantha N HeerschopWageningen University & Research, Wageningen, Netherlands.
Sander BiesbroekWageningen University & Research, Wageningen, Netherlands.
Pieter van 't VeerWageningen University & Research, Wageningen, Netherlands.
Jose DrijversNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment (Netherlands), Bilthoven, Netherlands.
Marieke van BakelNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment (Netherlands), Bilthoven, Netherlands.
Anne HollanderNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment (Netherlands), Bilthoven, Netherlands.
Elisabeth H M TemmeNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment (Netherlands), Bilthoven, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Universal access to healthy, safe, and environmentally sustainable diets is essential across all socio-economic backgrounds to improve human and planetary health. Objective: This modeling study examined the transition to healthier and more environmentally sustainable diets across socio-economic groups in the Netherlands, and investigated the associated implications for diet costs. Methods: Food consumption data for 1,747 adults were derived from the Dutch National Food Consumption Survey 2019-2021. Participants were categorized according to their highest attained educational level (low, intermediate, high) as proxy for socio-economic position (SEP). For each individual, the diet was minimized for greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and maximized for diet quality according to the Dutch Healthy Diet 2015 (DHD15) index. Optimized diets were made using a benchmark approach, involving linear combinations of current diets, either within or across the three educational subgroups. Constraints limited individual dietary changes to within 33% of current consumption, except for less commonly consumed food groups. Diet costs were compared between current and optimized diets. Secondary outcomes included nutritional aspects and additional environmental impact indicators. Results: The results show that modest dietary changes led to a 19%-24% reduction in GHG emissions and a 52%-56% improvement in diet quality, without increasing median diet costs across socio-economic subgroups. Depending on the educational subgroup, optimized diets included more vegetables, fruits, nuts, legumes, and fish, and less grains, dairy, meat, and sugars. More pronounced improvements were found when the optimization was not stratified by educational level. Conclusion: Across all socio-economic subgroups, modest dietary adjustments can improve health and environmental sustainability without added costs, offering a viable pathway to bridge socio-economic disparities in diet quality. Furthermore, socio-economic disparities in diet quality can be reduced without additional diet costs, provided these educational subgroups are willing and facilitated to adopt diets divergent from their peer group.

Indexed as

affordabilitydiet costsdiet inequalitiesdiet optimizationdutch dietsgreenhouse gas emissionssocio-economic positionsustainable diets

Identifiers

PMID41334335
PMCPMC12665553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.