ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2025
Diets optimized for environmental sustainability and health: implications for diet costs across socio-economic positions for Dutch adults.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Preferences for Meat and Meat Alternatives in Different Meal Scenarios: A Dutch Discrete Choice Experiment.Current developments in nutrition · 2026Article
- The hidden costs of Dutch dietary choices: quantifying the health and environmental costs attributable to suboptimal diets.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Universal access to healthy, safe, and environmentally sustainable diets is essential across all socio-economic backgrounds to improve human and planetary health. Objective: This modeling study examined the transition to healthier and more environmentally sustainable diets across socio-economic groups in the Netherlands, and investigated the associated implications for diet costs. Methods: Food consumption data for 1,747 adults were derived from the Dutch National Food Consumption Survey 2019-2021. Participants were categorized according to their highest attained educational level (low, intermediate, high) as proxy for socio-economic position (SEP). For each individual, the diet was minimized for greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and maximized for diet quality according to the Dutch Healthy Diet 2015 (DHD15) index. Optimized diets were made using a benchmark approach, involving linear combinations of current diets, either within or across the three educational subgroups. Constraints limited individual dietary changes to within 33% of current consumption, except for less commonly consumed food groups. Diet costs were compared between current and optimized diets. Secondary outcomes included nutritional aspects and additional environmental impact indicators. Results: The results show that modest dietary changes led to a 19%-24% reduction in GHG emissions and a 52%-56% improvement in diet quality, without increasing median diet costs across socio-economic subgroups. Depending on the educational subgroup, optimized diets included more vegetables, fruits, nuts, legumes, and fish, and less grains, dairy, meat, and sugars. More pronounced improvements were found when the optimization was not stratified by educational level. Conclusion: Across all socio-economic subgroups, modest dietary adjustments can improve health and environmental sustainability without added costs, offering a viable pathway to bridge socio-economic disparities in diet quality. Furthermore, socio-economic disparities in diet quality can be reduced without additional diet costs, provided these educational subgroups are willing and facilitated to adopt diets divergent from their peer group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.