ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2025
Higher quality nutrition care process documentation predicts nutrition diagnosis improvement in the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics breastfeeding registry study.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Registered dietitian nutritionists (RDNs) provide medical nutrition therapy (MNT) to improve public health outcomes, yet RDNs impact on breastfeeding outcomes remains underexplored. The Breastfeeding Registry Study addresses this gap by examining MNT provided to breastfeeding infants. This study describes Nutrition Care Process (NCP) documentation patterns, evaluates documentation quality, and reports nutrition diagnosis improvement, goal attainment, and outcomes predictors. Methods: This prospective, observational study included documentation from breastfeeding infants ( Results: Duration of any breastfeeding averaged 34.2 ± 7.5 (mean ± SD) days ( Discussion: Higher-quality documentation and more RDN visits were associated with improvements in breastfeeding infants' nutrition diagnoses. This is the first known study to describe comprehensive care plans delivered by RDNs that improved prevalent lactation-related nutrition problems and to propose standards for documenting breastfeeding care data in alignment with global breastfeeding standards.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.